Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 05-05-2021, 10:55 PM   #1
Lt. JG
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Location: California
Posts: 30
Default Mercruiser 5.7l replacement alternatives

Hi All,

I do not need to replace the engine now. But I'm curious.

From what I understand my MerCruiser 5.7l is marinazed version of Chevy small block 350 engine. And the marinization is:
1. Different camshaft;
2. Different exhaust manifolds (duh!);
3. Different dipstick and dipstick tube;
4. 160F thermostat;
5. Marine grade alternator;
6. And maybe marine grade starter.

Does it mean that I can pull my engine out, walk into Advanced Auto Parts, grab new Chevy 350 engine for $1,400, replace the cam, move all the covers and accessories from my old engine and slap the new engine back in...? [emoji2955][emoji2955][emoji2955]


Best wishes,
L


Sent from my SM-N981U using Tapatalk
__________________

LexiP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2021, 01:24 AM   #2
Admiral
 
mmwjr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Essex, Maryland
Posts: 10,217
Default

You forgot the casting (freeze) plugs are different as well as the carburetor. A marine rebuilt long block isn’t much more than an automotive one and is built to tighter specs. Automotive rebuilds can be bored .060 over which is twice what a marine rebuild would be and this thins the cylinder walls closer to the cooling jackets which if raw water cooled is less thickness for corrosion to eat through. Plus you’ll need to source a new cam. IMO it’s not worth the extra work to properly convert an automotive engine over just buy the correct one.
__________________

__________________
1997 Silverton 362, 7.4 Crusaders
1997 2400 SCR, 5.7 Vortec / Bravo 2

Mike
mmwjr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2021, 01:41 AM   #3
Lt. JG
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Location: California
Posts: 30
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mmwjr View Post
You forgot the casting (freeze) plugs are different as well as the carburetor. A marine rebuilt long block isn’t much more than an automotive one and is built to tighter specs. Automotive rebuilds can be bored .060 over which is twice what a marine rebuild would be and this thins the cylinder walls closer to the cooling jackets which if raw water cooled is less thickness for corrosion to eat through. Plus you’ll need to source a new cam. IMO it’s not worth the extra work to properly convert an automotive engine over just buy the correct one.
Freeze plugs don't seem to be a problem, especially keeping in mind that I plan to use automotive antifreeze.
Carburetor would come off the old engine.
I didn't catch the boring part - Advanced Auto Parts sells an assembled engine core with block, crankshaft, piston rods, pistons, heads with valves, rockers, etc, and camshaft. It comes without accessories, carb, manifolds, and covers.
New cam available online as a kit for $220.

Cheapest marinazed Chevy 350 is over $3,000 that is without manifolds, covers, and accessories. Drop in engine is about $9K for a carburetor version, and almost $12K for MPI version.

I see quite a difference between $1,400 + $220 and almost $9,000. That is with comparable amount of work. Would you agree...?

Sent from my SM-N981U using Tapatalk
LexiP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2021, 11:00 AM   #4
Captain
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 522
Default

Don’t forget to compare the internals as well.
Steel vs cast crank, rods, etc.
marine engines are under continuous load vs automotive that aren’t.
jparsons121 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2021, 12:06 PM   #5
Admiral
 
mmwjr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Essex, Maryland
Posts: 10,217
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LexiP View Post
Freeze plugs don't seem to be a problem, especially keeping in mind that I plan to use automotive antifreeze.
Carburetor would come off the old engine.
I didn't catch the boring part - Advanced Auto Parts sells an assembled engine core with block, crankshaft, piston rods, pistons, heads with valves, rockers, etc, and camshaft. It comes without accessories, carb, manifolds, and covers.
New cam available online as a kit for $220.

Cheapest marinazed Chevy 350 is over $3,000 that is without manifolds, covers, and accessories. Drop in engine is about $9K for a carburetor version, and almost $12K for MPI version.

I see quite a difference between $1,400 + $220 and almost $9,000. That is with comparable amount of work. Would you agree...?

Sent from my SM-N981U using Tapatalk
Automotive long block for a 5.7 is $1800 from Auto Zone, most marine long blocks go for around $2400 from online suppliers. Neither of these include the tin work their just the block, heads and all internals.
__________________
1997 Silverton 362, 7.4 Crusaders
1997 2400 SCR, 5.7 Vortec / Bravo 2

Mike
mmwjr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2021, 04:36 PM   #6
Lt. JG
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Location: California
Posts: 30
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jparsons121 View Post
Don’t forget to compare the internals as well.
Steel vs cast crank, rods, etc.
marine engines are under continuous load vs automotive that aren’t.
I actually would think that utilization mode for automotive engines is by far harsher then of the marine engines. Engines don't like constantly shifting rpms, but don't have problems working on the same rpm for hours. Otherwise "highway miles" wouldn't exist.

Sent from my SM-N981U using Tapatalk
LexiP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2021, 06:05 PM   #7
Admiral
 
mmwjr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Essex, Maryland
Posts: 10,217
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LexiP View Post
I actually would think that utilization mode for automotive engines is by far harsher then of the marine engines. Engines don't like constantly shifting rpms, but don't have problems working on the same rpm for hours. Otherwise "highway miles" wouldn't exist.

Sent from my SM-N981U using Tapatalk
It’s not just the rpm it’s the load on the engine. A marine application is a.ways under heavy load while a car has a transmission and free wheels part of the time. For a boat it’s like going up a steep incline all the time.
__________________
1997 Silverton 362, 7.4 Crusaders
1997 2400 SCR, 5.7 Vortec / Bravo 2

Mike
mmwjr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2021, 03:12 AM   #8
Lt. JG
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Location: California
Posts: 30
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mmwjr View Post
It’s not just the rpm it’s the load on the engine. A marine application is a.ways under heavy load while a car has a transmission and free wheels part of the time. For a boat it’s like going up a steep incline all the time.
I'm still not convinced. Even under constant load (like in a generator) but with (more or less) constant RPM I don't see it as a heavier utilization comparing to constantly changing rpms.

Sent from my SM-N981U using Tapatalk
LexiP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2021, 04:14 AM   #9
Captain
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 522
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LexiP View Post
I'm still not convinced. Even under constant load (like in a generator) but with (more or less) constant RPM I don't see it as a heavier utilization comparing to constantly changing rpms.

Sent from my SM-N981U using Tapatalk
In the end it’s your decision....
I can understand the urge to justify using the automotive engine due to the price difference. Like others who have commented, there are differences and from experience building both marine and Circle track race engines, the application dictates what is best.
jparsons121 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2021, 11:25 AM   #10
Admiral
 
mmwjr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Essex, Maryland
Posts: 10,217
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LexiP View Post
I'm still not convinced. Even under constant load (like in a generator) but with (more or less) constant RPM I don't see it as a heavier utilization comparing to constantly changing rpms.

Sent from my SM-N981U using Tapatalk
Your boat, your money do as you please. You asked the question and we replied. Go to any other boating forum and I doubt you’ll get a different response.
__________________

__________________
1997 Silverton 362, 7.4 Crusaders
1997 2400 SCR, 5.7 Vortec / Bravo 2

Mike
mmwjr is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT. The time now is 10:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.